TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
Sports
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | United StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My MoneyAutoZone
News Columns | Kashmir AngleJammu JournalInside the CapitalHimachal CallingHill View
Don't Miss
Advertisement

High Court: IPS officer Y Puran Kumar’s petition infructuous

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement

Tribune News Service
Chandigarh, July 12

Advertisement

The Punjab and Haryana High Court today disposed of as infructuous a petition filed by IPS officer Y Puran Kumar for quashing preliminary inquiry initiated on his complaint against Director-General of Police Manoj Yadava.

Advertisement

The order by Justice Manoj Bajaj came after the Bench was told that the inquiry stood concluded. The Bench was also told the inquiry report, dated May 28, had been challenged by the petitioner separately through another petition. As such, the petition before the Bench had been rendered infructuous.

Preliminary inquiry

Y Puran Kumar had filed a petition for quashing of preliminary inquiry initiated on his complaint against DGP Manoj Yadava

Advertisement

Kumar had filed the petition for the quashing of the preliminary inquiry as it was violative of Section 18-A of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. Directions were also sought to the respondent to act in accordance with law. Alternatively, it was prayed that the investigation of the case be handed over to any other independent agency.

Appearing before the Bench, his counsel stated that the petitioner had challenged the initiation of the inquiry by Senior Superintendent of Police, Ambala, but it stood concluded. “In view of the statement made by counsel for the petitioner, the petition is disposed of as infructuous,” Justice Bajaj concluded.

Advertisement
Show comments
Advertisement