Add Tribune As Your Trusted Source
TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | ChinaUnited StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My MoneyAutoZone
News Columns | Straight DriveCanada CallingLondon LetterKashmir AngleJammu JournalInside the CapitalHimachal CallingHill ViewBenchmark
Don't Miss
Advertisement

Bhupinder Hooda flags illegal segregation of trial, CBI put on notice

Claims trial court failed to exercise jurisdiction, power
Leader of Opposition Bhupinder Singh Hooda. Tribune file photo

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement

The Punjab and Haryana High Court today put the CBI on notice on a petition filed by a former CM, Bhupinder Singh Hooda, against the special court’s order dismissing his petition for postponement of proceedings. He contended that proceeding further in the matter by the trial court would amount to segregation/splitting up of trial as proceedings against some co-accused had been stayed by the Supreme Court.

Advertisement

Taking up the matter, Justice Tribhuvan Dahiya also fixed October 16 as the next date of hearing in the matter. In his petition, Hooda submitted that the CBI Special Judge at Panchkula dismissed his application seeking postponement of proceedings and passed an order for framing a formal chargesheet on the next date of hearing in the case registered on September 15, 2015, under the provisions of the IPC and the Prevention of Corruption Act.

Advertisement

He added that the case “CBI versus Bhupinder Singh Hooda and others” was pending for October 30 before the special court. “The decision of the trial court to proceed with framing of chargesheet against accused persons, except those co-accused qua whom proceedings have been stayed by Supreme Court, is segregation/splitting up of trial which is clear from the perusal of impugned orders. The segregation/splitting up on said basis is not permissible in law,” he said, adding that the trial court failed to exercise its jurisdiction and power.

Advertisement
Tags :
#ChargesheetFraming#PostponementPetition#SupremeCourtStay#TrialCourtOrderBhupinderSinghHoodaCBIInvestigationCorruptionCaseIndianJudiciaryLegalProceedingspunjabharyanahighcourt
Show comments
Advertisement