Add Tribune As Your Trusted Source
TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | ChinaUnited StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My MoneyAutoZone
News Columns | Straight DriveCanada CallingLondon LetterKashmir AngleJammu JournalInside the CapitalHimachal CallingHill ViewBenchmark
Don't Miss
Advertisement

Nafe Singh murder case: Complainant, kin given adequate security: Haryana to HC

Plea of INLD leader's driver seeking additional cover dismissed
The Punjab and Haryana High Court.

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement

The Haryana Government has informed the Punjab and Haryana High Court that it has provided adequate security to complainant Rakesh Kumar and his family in the murder case of former MLA Nafe Singh Rathee.

Advertisement

On February 25, 2024, four shooters had opened fire at the SUV of INLD leader Rathee at the Barahi level crossing in Bahadurgarh of Jhajjar district, killing him and a party worker. Three private gunmen hired by Rathee also sustained injuries in the attack.

Advertisement

In his petition, Kumar — who was Rathee's driver—stated that he was the complainant as well as an eyewitness in the FIR dated February 26, 2024, and sought issuance of directions to respondents to grant additional security to him and his family. He also urged that the head warden of the Rewari District Jail be added to his security detail, or replace a policeman already deputed in his security.

In the FIR, Kumar had stated that a white car was following their vehicle. Kumar tried to speed away, but was forced to stop as the Barahi level crossing was closed. Suddenly, five assailants stepped out of the car and opened fire.

The state counsel submitted that adequate security had been given to the petitioner and his family. He also submitted that the prayer to depute respondent no. 5 in the petitioner’s security could not be considered as he was working as the head warden at the District Jail, under the DGP (Prisons), who has not been impleaded as party in the petition.

Advertisement

After hearing the arguments, Justice Tribhuvan Dahiya said the facts have not been disputed by the petitioner nor has he impleaded the DGP as respondent. In view thereof, the petition stands disposed of as no further directions were called for at this stage.

Advertisement
Tags :
#BarahiLevelCrossing#HaryanaMurder#INLDLeader#JhajjarDistrict#RakeshKumarHaryanaHighCourtmurderinvestigationNafeSinghRatheePoliticalViolenceSecurityConcerns
Show comments
Advertisement