TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
Sports
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | United StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My MoneyAutoZone
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
Don't Miss
Advertisement

PIL against 'illegal' appointment of Nayab Singh Saini, 13 Cabinet ministers

High Court to hear petition on December 19
Chief Minister Nayab Singh Saini. File

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement

The Punjab and Haryana High Court today fixed December 19 for hearing a petition filed in public interest for quashing the appointment of Haryana Chief Minister Nayab Singh Saini and 13 Cabinet ministers on the ground of being “illegal and unconstitutional”.

Advertisement

The petition against the Union of India, the State of Haryana, Saini, the ministers and other respondents was placed before the Division Bench of Chief Justice Sheel Nagu and Justice Anil Kshetarpal. The Bench made it clear that the matter would be heard along with a related PIL filed earlier. The respondents would, on the date fixed, respond to the submissions made in the petition.

Advertisement

Among other things, advocate-petitioner Jagmohan Singh Bhatti stated that the appointments were arbitrary, a burden on the public exchequer and a setback to the austerity drive. He stated that the challenge was to the appointment of the newly sworn-in Cabinet in violation of the constitutional amendment.

Elaborating, he said the council of ministers in a State could not exceed 15 per cent of the total strength of the House. But in the present case, it exceeded 15 per cent of the total strength. Bhatti said Haryana had a 90-member legislative Assembly. As such, the total number of ministers, including the Chief Minister, could not exceed 13.

The petitioner further submitted that the respondent-State, in addition to the ministers, also conferred the Cabinet rank to the Advocate-General, “thus exceeding 15 per cent of the total strength of the House illegally and arbitrarily”.

Advertisement

Exceeds 15% of House strength

As per the plea, the council of ministers in a State could not exceed 15 per cent of the total strength of the House. But in the present case, it exceeded 15 per cent of the total strength of the 90-member Assembly.

Advertisement
Show comments
Advertisement