TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
Sports
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | United StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My MoneyAutoZone
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
Don't Miss
Advertisement

Pollution board served NGT notice for imposing penalty on Gurugram society

₹1.55 cr fine issued for non-functioning STP; damage due to rains, society argues

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement

The National Green Tribunal (NGT) has issued a notice and sought a reply from the Haryana State Pollution Control Board (HSPCB) in an appeal filed by Freedom Park Society, Gurugram, challenging the penalty of Rs 1.55 crore imposed as environmental compensation (EC) for a non-functioning sewerage treatment plant (STP). The pollution board, in its order on November 26, 2024, had imposed on the society a penalty of Rs 1,55,62,500, claiming that the STP at the housing society was not functioning when a team of the Gurugram HSPCB visited the society in August 2022 to collect samples.

Advertisement

Advocates Sumit Gehlot and TS Thakraon, on behalf of the society, contested that floods had occurred across Gurugram city in August 2022, and the problem with the STP was caused due to heavy rains and not due to any fault of the housing society.

Advertisement

They argued that, after the natural calamity, the society got the STP repaired, after which it was working as per environmental norms and parameters, which was also established in the lab test reports.

However, despite this, the HSPCB officials imposed the penalty, which was arbitrary and irrational and against the “Polluter Pay” principle laid down by the Supreme Court in various judgements, the lawyers maintained.

They told the court that the society could not have averted the heavy rainfall, therefore, it could not be penalised and held responsible by the HSPCB.

Advertisement

Advertisement
Show comments
Advertisement