TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | ChinaUnited StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My MoneyAutoZone
News Columns | Straight DriveCanada CallingLondon LetterKashmir AngleJammu JournalInside the CapitalHimachal CallingHill View
Don't Miss
Advertisement

Section 482 CrPC applicable to domestic violence complaints: Punjab and Haryana High Court

In a notable judgment, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has ruled that Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) — now Section 528 under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita — can apply to complaints under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. - File photo

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement

In a notable judgment, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has ruled that Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) — now Section 528 under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita — can apply to complaints under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The Division Bench, comprising Chief Justice Sheel Nagu and Justice Pankaj Jain, clarified that high courts hold the authority to address grievances arising from domestic violence complaints, with a few limited exceptions, ensuring fair judicial process and safeguarding against misuse.

Advertisement

Section 482 grants high courts inherent powers to prevent abuse of legal procedures in criminal cases, intervening when necessary to protect legal rights. This authority, in the context of the Domestic Violence Act, empowers the courts to prevent misuse of the legal process while securing justice.

Advertisement

The judgment came after a Single Bench referred questions to the Division Bench, seeking clarification due to conflicting interpretations on whether proceedings under Section 12 of the DV Act fell within the ambit of Section 482. The court reviewed international agreements like the Vienna Accord of 1994 and the Beijing Declaration of 1995, citing them to affirm the legislative intent behind the 2005 Act as a safeguard of civil rights in domestic relations.

Justice Jain, speaking for the Bench, clarified that while Chapter IV of the DV Act addresses civil rights, the procedure follows the Code of Criminal Procedure under Section 28, ensuring enforcement of orders. He stated, “The Act’s provisions do not explicitly exclude Section 482,” adding that inherent powers cannot be implicitly restricted when statutes lack specific language limiting high court jurisdiction.

Judgment reinforces high court’s authority to prevent its misuse

Advertisement

Advertisement
Show comments
Advertisement