TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | ChinaUnited StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My MoneyAutoZone
News Columns | Straight DriveCanada CallingLondon LetterKashmir AngleJammu JournalInside the CapitalHimachal CallingHill View
Don't Miss
Advertisement

Delhi riots FIR a sham, says Umar Khalid

Umar Khalid. File photo

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement

Umar Khalid on Thursday told a Delhi Court that he has spent five years in jail in what he called a “joke of an FIR” filed under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) in connection with the 2020 Delhi riots conspiracy case.

Advertisement

Senior advocate Trideep Pais, appearing for Khalid before Additional Sessions Judge Sameer Bajpai at Karkardooma Court, argued that FIR 59 of 2020, probed by the Delhi Police Special Cell, was an unnecessary exercise since the deaths and violence during the North-East Delhi riots are already covered in separate FIRs.  He said the so-called “larger conspiracy” case lacked legal sanctity and was built on weak foundations.

Advertisement

Pais told the court that if there were a genuine conspiracy, it would have been reflected across the multiple riots cases registered in 2020. “Neither in general nor in specific terms is there any linkage to Khalid or others like him, not even through witness statements,” he submitted.

Highlighting past judicial orders in related riots cases, Pais said several accused had been discharged after courts flagged biased investigation. He accused the Delhi Police of reverse engineering the case. 

“First, a person is chosen to be implicated, and then documents are manufactured to reach that end,” he argued, describing it as evidence of targeting rather than investigation.

Advertisement

The defence also dismissed the first supplementary chargesheet filed in November 2020 as baseless. According to Pais, the document relies on “embellishments” unsupported by witness testimony or recoveries.

On the prosecution’s claim that Khalid was a “veteran of sedition” who had used anti-India slogans in 2016, Pais pointed out that the Delhi Police’s own chargesheet in the JNU case had recorded that Khalid had not uttered the alleged words. 

“The same agency that cleared him in 2016 is now attributing false statements to him in this case,” he said.

Khalid, arrested on September 13, 2020, has already spent five years in custody. Earlier this month, the Delhi High Court denied him bail, a decision he has since challenged in the Supreme Court. The trial court will continue hearing arguments on framing of charges on September 17.

Advertisement
Tags :
#2020DelhiRiots#FalseImplication#KarkardoomaCourt#UmarKhaliddelhipoliceDelhiRiotsIndianJusticeSystemLegalBattleNorthEastDelhiRiotsUAPA
Show comments
Advertisement