TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | ChinaUnited StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My MoneyAutoZone
News Columns | Straight DriveCanada CallingLondon LetterKashmir AngleJammu JournalInside the CapitalHimachal CallingHill View
Don't Miss
Advertisement

Lawyers flag ‘conflict of interest’ in Kejri case

Say ED’s lawyer is judge’s brother, write to CJI

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement

New Delhi, July 5

Advertisement

Over 150 lawyers have written to CJI DY Chandrachud over “conflict of interest” of Delhi HC Judge Sudhir Kumar Jain who heard ED appeal against bail to CM Arvind Kejriwal in a money laundering case related to the Delhi excise policy “scam”.

Advertisement

They claimed Justice Jain should have rescued himself from proceedings as his brother was an ED counsel. Sources, however, said advocate Anurag Jain was not handling any money laundering case related to the “scam”. The representation by 157 lawyers also bears the signature of AAP legal cell chief Sanjeev Nasiar. They expressed concern over a purported internal communication from a district judge here asking vacation judges of trial courts to not pass a final order in pending cases during a court recess, calling it “unprecedented”.

Advertisement
Tags :
ArvindKejriwalDhananjayaYChandrachud
Show comments
Advertisement