TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | ChinaUnited StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My MoneyAutoZone
News Columns | Straight DriveCanada CallingLondon LetterKashmir AngleJammu JournalInside the CapitalHimachal CallingHill View
Don't Miss
Advertisement

Michel may flee: ED opposes Agusta middleman’s bail plea

Christian Michel

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement

The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has opposed the bail plea of British national Christian Michel in a money laundering case linked to the AgustaWestland scam, stating that he posed a serious risk of escaping from the clutches of law enforcement agencies.

Advertisement

“Being a British citizen, he has the means to abscond. There is a real possibility of him escaping,” ED’s special counsel Zoheb Hossain contended before Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma.

Advertisement

Countering this claim, Michel’s lawyer, advocate Aljo Joseph, insisted that his client lacked the means to leave the country since his passport had expired.

Joseph also raised concerns over Michel’s prolonged incarceration, emphasising that he had already spent over six years in custody, including his detention in Dubai before extradition. “Once the maximum sentence is completed as an undertrial, my client should be released,” Joseph reasoned.

The advocate pointed out that the trial court in the related CBI case is yet to stipulate the conditions for Michel’s release. “If bail is granted, he would still need the trial court’s permission to leave,” he added.

Advertisement

Justice Sharma acknowledged that the trial court is yet to impose bail conditions in the predicate offence and remarked, “I want to see what conditions they set before deciding on this matter.” The court scheduled the next hearing for February 28.

Advertisement
Show comments
Advertisement