Add Tribune As Your Trusted Source
TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | ChinaUnited StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My Money
News Columns | Straight DriveCanada CallingLondon LetterKashmir AngleJammu JournalInside the CapitalHimachal CallingHill ViewBenchmark
Don't Miss
Advertisement

Opposition grills Law Commission chief on need for one poll

The committee’s next meeting is scheduled for December 10
Photo for representational purpose only. Reuters file

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement

Opposition members on Thursday questioned the Chairperson of the Law Commission on the usefulness of holding simultaneous elections, amid allegations that the ‘One Nation, One Election’ (ONOE) Bills have been drafted without taking the public into confidence.

Advertisement

The Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC), which is examining the Constitution (One Hundred and Twenty-Ninth Amendment) Bill, 2024, and the Union Territories Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2024, that would enable ONOE, heard submissions from Dinesh Maheshwari, Chairperson of the 23rd Law Commission of India.

Advertisement

According to sources, Congress MP Priyanka Gandhi Vadra is learnt to have asked Maheshwari how simultaneous elections would be useful for the country and reportedly sought three concrete examples to justify the proposal.

The Law Commission chief also faced a series of questions after he apparently remarked that people should not concern themselves with the election schedule or the timing of polls, and should instead focus on their role as voters. Several members, sources said, asked how voters’ role could be sidelined in an electoral process.

Some Opposition members also raised concerns that ONOE was being pushed without meaningful public consultation, despite voters being central to any democratic exercise.

Advertisement

After the three-hour meeting, JPC chairperson and BJP MP PP Chaudhary told reporters that clarifications had been provided to members who had doubts, and any additional issues would be taken in writing.

“The experts came, including the Law Commission Chairman. All members asked for clarification, and everything will be considered before the committee makes its recommendations. ONOE is in the country’s interest because it will solve several issues, whether economic or related to governance… The committee is giving everyone ample time to present their views,” he said.

The committee’s next meeting is scheduled for December 10, where Rajya Sabha MP and senior advocate Kapil Sibal has been invited to depose. Representatives from the Election Commission have also been invited, though Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar is unlikely to attend amid the ongoing row over the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls and mounting Opposition criticism.

Advertisement
Show comments
Advertisement