Add Tribune As Your Trusted Source
TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | ChinaUnited StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My Money
News Columns | Straight DriveCanada CallingLondon LetterKashmir AngleJammu JournalInside the CapitalHimachal CallingHill ViewBenchmark
Don't Miss
Advertisement

Preliminary report doesn’t blame Air India pilot for crash, Centre tells SC

Says Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau inquiry is not for apportioning blame on anyone

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement

The Centre on Thursday told the Supreme Court that the Air India pilot had not been blamed in the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) preliminary report into the June 12 plane crash that claimed 265 lives, including those of both pilots and crew members.

Advertisement

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta told a Bench of Justice Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi that an AAIB team was set up to look into the crash under an international regime, and the investigation was currently underway. There’s a statutory provision for it, he added.

Advertisement

“The AAIB inquiry is not for apportioning blame on anyone. It is only to clarify the cause so that the same does not happen again,” the Bench said.

Advocate Prashant Bhushan, representing an NGO, said a parallel inquiry, such as a court of inquiry, should probe into the accident. “A pilots’ federation has stated that these airplanes cannot be trusted and there is a huge risk on people flying in their aircraft,” he said.

Noting that these proceedings should not become a fight between airlines, the Bench issued a notice to the Centre and DGCA on a petition filed by Pushkar Raj Sabharwal, father of Captain Sumeet Sabharwal who died in the crash, and posted the matter for further hearing after two weeks.

Advertisement

“You should not carry this burden that your son is being blamed... Nobody can blame him for anything… No one in India believes it was the pilot’s fault… It was an accident,” the Bench had said on November 7.

“It’s extremely unfortunate that this crash took place, but you should not carry this burden that your son is being blamed... Nobody can blame him for anything… No one in India believes it was the pilot’s fault… It was an accident. There is no insinuation against him even in the preliminary report,” Justice Kant had told 91-year-old Pushkar Raj.

Expressing concern over the selective leak of the preliminary inquiry report, which led to a media narrative blaming pilot error for the crash of the London-bound Air India flight AI171, the Bench had earlier noted that certain aspects of the July 12 AAIB preliminary report indicating lapses on the part of pilots were “irresponsible”.

Advertisement
Show comments
Advertisement