TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | ChinaUnited StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My MoneyAutoZone
News Columns | Straight DriveCanada CallingLondon LetterKashmir AngleJammu JournalInside the CapitalHimachal CallingHill View
Don't Miss
Advertisement

RS Dy Chairman rejects Oppn’s notice for Dhankhar’s removal

Says moved in haste to mar reputation of Vice-President’s office
Rajya Sabha Chairman Jagdeep Dhankhar conducts proceedings in the House during the winter session of Parliament on Thursday. PTI

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement

Deputy Chairman of the Rajya Sabha Harivansh on Thursday rejected the Congress-led Opposition notice moved to bring a motion of no confidence against House Chairman and Vice-President Jagdeep Dhankhar, calling it severely flawed and moved in haste to mar the reputation of the second-highest constitutional office.

Advertisement

In a preliminary ruling on the notice submitted on December 10, Harivansh said, “The gravity of this personally targeted notice bereft of facts and aimed at securing publicity makes its expose expedient, being misadventure in deliberate trivialising and demeaning of the high constitutional office of the Vice-President of the largest democracy. In view of the above, the notice is held as an act of impropriety, severely flawed, apparently drawn in haste and hurry to mar the reputation of the Vice-President and aimed to damage the constitutional institution. The same deserves to be and is hereby dismissed. A detailed order, being expedient, would follow.”

Advertisement

He said on December 10, a communication purportedly signed by 60 members of the Council of States, addressed to no specific authority, sought consideration of the same under Article 67(b) of the Constitution as intention of a no-confidence motion against the VP, and subsequently publicised by the main opposition party, the Indian National Congress.

“Invoked Article 67(b) peremptorily mandates at least 14 days’ prior notice for any resolution contemplating the Vice-President’s removal. Thus December 10 notice of intention could permit such a resolution only after December 24. The current 266th session of the Council of States, as notified on November 5, commenced on November 25 and scheduled to conclude on December 20 — as known to all putative signatories. In full know of the situation that the resolution cannot be brought during this session, this was initiated only to set a narrative against the second highest constitutional office and the VP,” Harivansh said.

He cited an instance of similar rejection in 2020 on procedural grounds of a notice for motion to remove the then deputy chairman. The rejection had then come from House Chairman M Venkaiah Naidu.

Advertisement

Advertisement
Show comments
Advertisement