Add Tribune As Your Trusted Source
TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | ChinaUnited StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My Money
News Columns | Straight DriveCanada CallingLondon LetterKashmir AngleJammu JournalInside the CapitalHimachal CallingHill ViewBenchmark
Don't Miss
Advertisement

SC junks petition seeking ban on sale of Arundhati Roy's book with her smoking pic on cover

Bench noted that Roy did not promote smoking and the readership of her book was restricted to those who would buy and read it

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement

Terming it a publicity litigation, the Supreme Court on Friday dismissed a petition seeking a ban on the sale, circulation and display of Arundhati Roy’s book, 'Mother Mary Comes to Me' that depicted her smoking a bidi/cigarette on its cover, in contravention of the law.

Advertisement

“This is not an advertisement. You may disagree with the views of the author but that does not mean such a case can lie," a Bench of Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi said, dismissing Rajasimhan’s appeal against the Kerala High court order rejecting his PIL. It cautioned him against filing such petitions just for publicity.

Advertisement

The Bench noted that her literary work did not constitute any violation of Section 5 of the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Prohibition of Advertisement and Regulation of Trade and Commerce, Production, Supply and Distribution) Act, 2003’ (COTPA).

"She is a renowned author. She has not promoted such a thing. There is a warning in the book, and she is a prominent person as well. Why do such a thing for publicity? There is no hoarding in the city with the picture of the book. It is for someone who will take the book and read it. Her picture with it does not portray any such thing. Book, publisher or author has nothing to do with advertising for cigarettes etc" the CJI said.

The petitioner – who challenged the high court’s October 13 order dismissing the plea -- contended that the cover photo amounted to a violation of Section 5 of 2003 Act which regulates advertisements of tobacco products.

Advertisement

However, the Bench noted that Roy did not promote smoking and the readership of her book was restricted to those who would buy and read it.

Advertisement
Show comments
Advertisement