TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | ChinaUnited StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My MoneyAutoZone
News Columns | Straight DriveCanada CallingLondon LetterKashmir AngleJammu JournalInside the CapitalHimachal CallingHill View
Don't Miss
Advertisement

SC panel seeks ban on Conocarpus trees

Has adverse impact on biodiversity & public health, leads to excessive water consumption

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement
Glossy leaves, fast growth within a decade and zero maintenance make real estate developers and urban local bodies fall for the ornamental Conocarpus trees.
Advertisement

The Supreme Court’s Central Empowered Committee (CEC) has now in a report sought a ban on the Conocarpus trees to avoid environmental degradation and adverse impact on health.

Advertisement

It has asked the apex court to direct the Union Environment Ministry to restrict the promotion and sale of this tree and other exotic invasive species by nurseries, and promote planting of native species.

In its report, the panel stated that conocarpus trees’ unchecked proliferation poses serious concerns, including adverse impacts on native biodiversity, alteration of local ecosystems, excessive groundwater consumption and potential risks to public health.

According to the report, “Conocarpus has been introduced primarily for ornamental and avenue plantation purposes. Their rapid growth, high drought tolerance and resistance to urban stressors like air pollution and poor soil conditions have contributed to their popularity in several Indian states, especially in urban landscapes, road medians and semi-arid zones.”

Advertisement

“However, their non-native status and increasing reports of ecological disruption have raised concerns, prompting calls for a critical re-evaluation of their widespread use in public and private green initiatives,” the report said.

Highlighting the impact of trees on health, the report said that during the flowering season, the tree releases pollen, which may aggravate respiratory conditions such as asthma, rhinitis, and other allergic reactions, particularly in children and the elderly.

“Urban local bodies have flagged its presence as a potential public health risk. Strong, invasive roots often damage footpaths, underground pipelines and foundation of buildings. Despite being drought-tolerant, Conocarpus has a deep and aggressive root system that extracts significant amounts of groundwater,” the SC committee report said.

The committee in a report to the apex court has said that there was no specific legal framework in India that exclusively deals with invasive species.

“This lack of a dedicated legal framework is a significant gap that hinders effective management and control of invasive alien species. There is no nationally coordinated mechanism for monitoring and regulation of invasive alien species, whether plant, animal, microbial or fungal!” the report said.

Neem, Karanj, Siris and Kachnar have been suggested as alternatives species. “We are already encouraging the use of native species. Even in the project to expand greenery in the Aravallis, we are planting native species,” an official from the Environment Ministry said.

Advertisement
Tags :
#EcologicalImpact#InvasiveSpeciesAirPollutionAlternativeSpeciesConocarpusBanEnvironmentalDegradationGroundwaterDepletionNativeTreesPublicHealthRiskUrbanGreening
Show comments
Advertisement