TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
Sports
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | United StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My MoneyAutoZone
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
Don't Miss
Advertisement

Supreme Court protects MP scribes against coercive action, asks them to move high court   

Bhind journalists have alleged that they were beaten and manhandled on May 1 inside the SP's office, an allegation denied by the officer.

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement

The Supreme Court on Monday protected in the interim two Madhya Pradesh-based journalists who were allegedly assaulted by the state police for reporting on illegal sand mining activities.

Advertisement

A Bench of Justices Prashant Kumar Mishra and Manmohan, however, refused to examine their plea and asked them to move the Madhya Pradesh High Court instead.

Advertisement

A separate top court Bench on June 4 had sought the responses of the MP and Delhi governments on the plea of Shashikant Jatav and Amarkant Singh Chouhan.

The apex court, while granting them interim relief, posted the hearing on June 9. “We are not entertaining the plea. However, looking at the allegations, we permit the petitioners to move the HC concerned within two weeks from today. Till the time the petitioners move high court, they shall not be arrested,” Justice Mishra said.

The journalists from Bhind district recently alleged that they were beaten and manhandled on May 1 inside the office of the superintendent of police, an allegation denied by the officer.

Advertisement

The SC had previously asked why the petitioners did not make the Bhind SP a party to the petition. Besides, it asked why the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) and the NCT of Delhi were made parties.

Advertisement
Show comments
Advertisement