TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
Sports
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | United StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My MoneyAutoZone
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
Don't Miss
Advertisement

Supreme Court refuses to quash FIR against N Chandrababu Naidu in skill corp scam

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement

Satya Prakash

Advertisement

Advertisement

New Delhi, January 16

The Supreme Court on Tuesday rejected TDP chief N Chandrababu Naidu’s petition seeking quashing of an FIR against him in the Skill Development Corporation scam case even as it delivered a split verdict on prior sanction to prosecute the former Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

A Bench of Justice Aniruddha Bose and Justice Bela M Trivedi, which upheld the remand order passed by a magistrate’s court and the Andhra Pradesh High Court’s decision dismissing his plea for quashing of the FIR, differed on the interpretation of Section 17-A of the Prevention of Corruption Act. The Bench directed that the matter be placed before the CJI for appropriate directions. Now, the CJI will set up a larger Bench for an authoritative pronouncement on the legal issues involved in the matter.

Advertisement

Added to the Prevention of Corruption Act in 2018, Section 17-A requires a police officer to seek prior sanction from the competent authority for conducting any enquiry or inquiry or investigation into any alleged offence of corruption committed by a public servant.

While Justice Bose ruled that prior sanction for conducting a probe into the alleged offences against Naidu was needed, Justice Trivedi differed and went on to dismiss Naidu’s appeal.

Advertisement
Tags :
SupremeCourt
Show comments
Advertisement