TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | ChinaUnited StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My MoneyAutoZone
News Columns | Straight DriveCanada CallingLondon LetterKashmir AngleJammu JournalInside the CapitalHimachal CallingHill View
Don't Miss
Advertisement

SC to hear pleas for court-monitored probe into Tirupati laddu row today

Hearing deferred after SG Mehta seeks adjournment
Photo for representational purpose only. File photo

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement

The Supreme Court on Thursday deferred to October 4 the hearing on petitions seeking a court-monitored probe into alleged use of ghee adulterated with animal fat in preparing laddus offered as prasadam at the famous Tirumala Tirupati Temple in Andhra Pradesh.

Advertisement

“If your lordships permit, can I respond at 10.30 am sharp tomorrow (Friday),” Solicitor General Tushar Mehta told a Bench of Justices BR Gavai and KV Viswanathan, which agreed to the request.

Advertisement

On September 30, the top court had sought Mehta’s assistance to decide if an SIT set up by the Andhra Pradesh Government should continue to work or the probe should be assigned to an independent agency. Mehta would now seek instructions from the Centre and inform the Bench on Friday.

On the last date of hearing, the top court had rapped Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister N Chandrababu Naidu for going public with allegations about the use of adulterated ghee for preparing laddus at the Tirumala Tirupati Temple, saying it was inappropriate for him to make such a statement without waiting for the outcome of a probe ordered by the state.

“At least, we expect the gods to be kept away from politics,” the Bench had said, as it sought to know if there was a need to make a public statement when a probe into the matter had already been ordered and the report was awaited.

Advertisement

“We are prima facie of the view that when the investigation was under process, it was not appropriate for the high constitutional authority (Naidu) to make a statement which can affect the sentiments of crores of people,” the Bench said.

While hearing petitions seeking a probe into the alleged use of animal fact for preparing prasadam at the Tirupati temple, the top court sought to know what proof was there to indicate that contaminated ghee was used in making laddus.

The petitioners include senior BJP leader Subramanian Swamy; YV Subba Reddy — a Rajya Sabha MP and former Chairman of Tirupati Tirumala Devasthanam which manages the Tirupati Temple; historian Vikram Sampath; spiritual leader Dushyanth Sridhar; and Sudarshan News editor-in-chief Suresh Chavhanke.

Mehta had submitted that it was a matter of faith and if contaminated ghee was used in preparing laddus at the temple, it was unacceptable.

Naidu had alleged that animal fat was used in preparing laddus during the previous YS Jagan Mohan Reddy-led government in Andhra Pradesh, triggering a massive political row, even as the YSR Congress accused Naidu of indulging in “heinous allegations” for political gains.

Advertisement
Show comments
Advertisement