Add Tribune As Your Trusted Source
TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | ChinaUnited StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My Money
News Columns | Straight DriveCanada CallingLondon LetterKashmir AngleJammu JournalInside the CapitalHimachal CallingHill ViewBenchmark
Don't Miss
Advertisement

Stalin says ‘no rest until amending Constitution to fix timelines for governors to clear Bills’

Was reacting to the Supreme Court's advisory opinion on the Presidential Reference
Tamil Nadu Chief Minister and DMK president MK Stalin. PTI file

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement

Tamil Nadu Chief Minister and DMK president MK Stalin on Friday asserted that "there will be no rest" until amending the Constitution to fix timelines for governors to clear Bills.

Advertisement

In his first reaction to the Supreme Court's advisory opinion on the Presidential Reference, he said, "Our fight for state rights and true federalism will continue."

Advertisement

In a statement, Stalin said the Supreme Court's opinion in its answer to the Presidential Reference will have no impact on the April 8, 2025 judgment in the case of State of Tamil Nadu vs Governor of Tamil Nadu.

In fact, the chief minister said, the Bench tendering the advisory opinion has reaffirmed several key principles. It includes an assertion that the elected government should be in the driver's seat, and there cannot be two executive power centres in the state.

Constitutional functionaries must act within the constitutional framework — never above it, the governor has no fourth option to kill the Bill or exercise a pocket veto (as was done by the Tamil Nadu governor) and he has no option to withhold the Bill simpliciter, were among the reaffirmed principles, the CM asserted.

Advertisement

The top court also affirmed again that the governor cannot indefinitely delay acting on Bills. In cases of prolonged, unexplained, and indefinite delay by the governor in considering a Bill, states can approach the Constitutional courts and hold governors accountable for their deliberate inactions.

The nine-Judge Bench in Ahmedabad St Xavier's College Society v State of Gujarat (1974) 1 SCC 717 (Para 109) clearly held: "Advisory opinion of the court would have no more effect than the opinion of the law officers."

The Supreme Court's opinion delivered on November 20 has again rejected the Tamil Nadu governor's theory of pocket veto and assertion that Bills can be killed or buried by the Raj Bhavan.

The CM said, "Through our legal battle, we have now compelled governors, including the Tamil Nadu governor, who are at odds with the elected government across the country, to work in line with the elected government and be accountable for their deliberate inaction in response to the people's will through legislation."

Advertisement
Tags :
#BillsClearance#ConstitutionAmendment#GovernorBills#GovernorVsCM#StateRights#SupremeCourtOpinion#TamilNaduGovernorBillClearanceDMKFederalismGovernorsAccountabilityMKStalinSupremeCourtTamilNaduPolitics
Show comments
Advertisement