TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
Sports
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | United StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My MoneyAutoZone
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
Don't Miss
Advertisement

Supreme Court goes gender neutral, mentions term ‘pregnant persons’ 42 times in verdict

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement

Satya Prakash

Advertisement

Advertisement

New Delhi, May 6

Noting that pregnancy can also be experienced by some non-binary people and transgender men, the Supreme Court has for the first time used the term “pregnant persons” instead of “pregnant woman” or “pregnant girl” in a judgment.

A three-judge Bench led by CJI DY Chandrachud – which on 29 April recalled its earlier order allowing termination of 31-week pregnancy of a minor rape victim from Mumbai – has used the expression “pregnant person/s” 42 times in its 22-page verdict.

Advertisement

“We use the term ‘pregnant person’ and recognise that in addition to cisgender women, pregnancy can also be experienced by some non-binary people and transgender men among other gender identities,” the Bench explained.

The court gave primacy to the opinion of a pregnant person — even if minor or mentally ill — in deciding on abortion of an over 24-week-old foetus. “The consent of a pregnant person in decisions of reproductive autonomy and termination of pregnancy is paramount. In case there is a divergence in the opinion of a pregnant person and her guardian, the opinion of the minor or mentally ill pregnant person must be taken into consideration,” it said.

Advertisement
Tags :
SupremeCourt
Show comments
Advertisement