TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | ChinaUnited StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My MoneyAutoZone
News Columns | Straight DriveCanada CallingLondon LetterKashmir AngleJammu JournalInside the CapitalHimachal CallingHill View
Don't Miss
Advertisement

Supreme Court protects psephologist Sanjay Kumar in EC's FIRs

FIRs accused him of spreading misinformation related to Maharashtra's electoral rolls through posts on X
Photo for representational purpose only. PTI file

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement

The Supreme Court on Monday granted protection from arrest to psephologist Sanjay Kumar in connection with two FIRs lodged by the Election Commission accusing him of spreading misinformation related to Maharashtra's electoral rolls through posts on social media.

Advertisement

A Bench comprising Chief Justice B R Gavai and Justice N V Anjaria took note of the submissions of senior advocate Vivek Tankha and lawyer Sumeer Sodhi that the FIRs have been lodged despite the public apology issued by the psephologist.

Advertisement

“Issue notice. In the meantime, there shall be no coercive action,” the CJI said.

Kumar, co-director of Lokniti at the Centre for the Study of Developing Societies (CSDS), has approached the top court seeking the quashing of two FIRs lodged against him in Maharashtra.

The FIRs accused him of spreading misinformation related to Maharashtra's electoral rolls through posts on social media platform X.

Advertisement

The petition alleges that the FIRs constitute a misuse of law and are an attempt to harass an academic for what was, at worst, a bona fide error.

Advertisement
Tags :
#ElectionMisinformation#LoknitiCSDS#SocialMediaMisinformationCoerciveActionStayedFIRQuashingFreeSpeechAcademicMaharashtraElectoralRollsPsephologistSanjayKumarSupremeCourtIndia
Show comments
Advertisement