TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
Sports
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | United StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | Time CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My MoneyAutoZone
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
Advertisement

SC restores criminal proceedings against ex-Kerala minister in 1990 evidence-tampering case

Antony Raju had allegedly tampered with evidence in a drug seizure case while representing the accused—an Australian citizen—as a lawyer
Advertisement

The Supreme Court on Wednesday restored criminal proceedings against former Kerala transport minister Antony Raju who allegedly tampered with evidence in a 1990 drug seizure case.

Advertisement

”The accused shall appear before the trial court on December 20, 2024 or on the next working day of court concerned,” a Bench of Justice CT Ravikumar and Justice Sanjay Karol said, directing the trial court to conclude the proceedings within a year.

Advertisement

It can’t be said that the high court order allowing fresh proceedings against Raju was bad in law, the Bench added.

Raju, a leader of Janadhipathya Kerala Congress and an ally of the ruling Left Democratic Front (LDF), had allegedly tampered with evidence in a drug seizure case while representing the accused—an Australian citizen—as a lawyer.

The Australian man was arrested from the international airport in Thiruvananthapuram on charges of carrying hashish and the prosecution had produced an innerwear as part of the evidence against him saying the contraband was smuggled in that. He was sentenced to 10-years rigorous imprisonment.

Advertisement

However, the high court acquitted him in 1993 after his counsel proved that the innerwear was too small for him.

Probe revealed that Raju, who represented the accused, had received the underwear from the court and returned it four months later before the accused moved the high court. A district court had ordered a registration of a case against Raju and a court clerk for tampering with evidence.

Advertisement
Tags :
drug caseKeralaSupreme Court
Show comments
Advertisement