Demolitions in Jammu spark call for fairness and sensitivity
Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium
Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only BenefitsThe recent demolition drive in Jammu — during which the house of a social-media journalist’s father was also razed — has reignited debate over the balance between legal authority and humanitarian responsibility.
While it is true that the house stood on state land and the Jammu Development Authority (JDA) acted within its legal mandate after issuing notices, many believe the administration also carries a moral obligation: to show compassion wherever possible and allow adequate time for residents to seek alternatives.
Local residents widely acknowledge that action against encroachers is necessary, given how common such occupations have become across Jammu. At the same time, they argue that accountability must be uniform. Several influential individuals and political leaders are alleged to have occupied state land for years, yet have faced little to no action from authorities. This perception of selective enforcement continues to erode public trust.
As JDA intensifies its campaign against illegal structures, the need for a more humane approach has become increasingly evident. Rapid urban expansion, rising land pressure and administrative lapses have allowed numerous settlements to emerge in areas such as Bathindi, Narwal, Roop Nagar, and along the banks of the Tawi river. Legally, the administration is empowered to act even if families have lived on encroached land for decades. But legality alone does not settle the issue.
Modern governance requires enforcement rooted not just in the law, but in fairness, transparency and compassion. Many families living on encroached land are unaware of the legal complexities, having relied on intermediaries who misrepresented ownership. For them, demolition means sudden displacement and profound emotional distress.
A balanced approach is essential. Clear notices, reasonable response time, and proper explanation of land status can reduce conflict. Wherever feasible, authorities should explore alternatives — including temporary rehabilitation — to ensure vulnerable families are not rendered homeless. Above all, consistent action in all cases, regardless of influence or political stature, is crucial to restoring faith in the system.
As Jammu continues to grow, the challenge of preventing encroachment will only intensify. Authorities responsible for safeguarding state land must be held accountable for lapses that allow illegal structures to proliferate. Only through transparent, uniform and humane enforcement can the administration navigate the complex realities of development and displacement in the region.