Add Tribune As Your Trusted Source
TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | ChinaUnited StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My MoneyAutoZone
News Columns | Straight DriveCanada CallingLondon LetterKashmir AngleJammu JournalInside the CapitalHimachal CallingHill View
Don't Miss
Advertisement

J&K, Ladakh HC agrees to consider listing plea against forfeiture of books

Petition challenged govt’s order to forfeit 25 books for allegedly propagating 'false narrative and secessionism'

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement

The High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh has agreed to consider setting up a bench to hear a plea challenging the government’s order to forfeit 25 books for allegedly propagating “false narrative and secessionism” in the region.

Advertisement

The plea, filed by former Air Vice Marshal Kapil Kak, author Sumantra Bose, Radha Kumar and former Central Information Commissioner Wajahat Habibullah, has sought quashing of the notification issued by the Jammu and Kashmir government on August 5. The petitioners have also prayed for the return of all confiscated copies of the books.

Advertisement

The petition was mentioned by advocate Vrinda Grover before a bench headed by Chief Justice of the Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court Justice Arun Palli for urgent hearing on Tuesday.

The Chief Justice said he will look at the papers and then pass orders for the constitution of a special bench of three judges to hear the plea at the earliest. The petition has invoked Section 99 read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) and seeks to quash and set aside the notification which ordered the forfeiture of the publications.

The order alleged that the works “propagate false narrative and secessionism in Jammu and Kashmir” and were prejudicial to the security and integrity of India.

Advertisement

According to the petitioners, the books in question largely concern the socio-political life, cultural history, and political struggles of Kashmir, with many of them being academic works considered part of the historical record.

Advertisement
Tags :
#KashmirBooksBan#SecessionismAcademicFreedomBookForfeiturefreespeechIndianJudiciaryJammuKashmirHighCourtKashmirConflictKashmirHistoryLegalChallenge
Show comments
Advertisement