TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
Sports
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | United StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My MoneyAutoZone
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
Don't Miss
Advertisement

Prove DVR theft charge: SAD leader to MLA

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement

Jalandhar, August 19

Advertisement

Days after the Maqsudan police registered a case of theft of digital video recorders (DVRs) against Shiromani Akali Dal (SAD) leader HS Walia and MC councillor Nirmal Singh Nimma, the duo on Friday came forward and openly challenged Kartarpur AAP MLA Balkar Singh to prove allegations against them.

Advertisement

Having availed an anticipatory bail in the case, Walia alleged Balkar Singh, who has served as the DCP, Jalandhar Police, earlier, was trying to victimise him and Nimma over a trivial matter for his personal gains. Balkar, however, has outrightly denied any involvement in the matter.

Giving details, Walia, who was an AAP leader before switching to the SAD, said, “The matter pertains to Kotla village, which falls in the Kartarpur constituency. A property measuring about 26 kanals is owned by Swaran Singh. Following a legal dispute, the property was equally divided between his son Surinder Singh and his daughter.

“The property in dispute falls in MC Ward No.6 from where Nimma is the councillor. A Surinder’s relative had eyes on his property. But the matter was sorted out between Surinder and his relative two months ahead of Assembly polls in favour of Surinder. Nimma ensured that the registry of the property was done in the name of Surinder.”

Advertisement

Advertisement
Show comments
Advertisement