TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
Sports
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | United StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My MoneyAutoZone
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
Don't Miss
Advertisement

78 adjournments in 7 yrs in fraud case, Supreme Court raps Dehradun court

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement

Satya Prakash

Advertisement

Tribune News Service

Advertisement

New Delhi, September 17

Piqued over 78 adjournments given by a Dehradun court in a cheating case hanging fire since 2014, the Supreme Court has ordered completion of the trial in six months.

“We direct the trial court to ensure that the trial is concluded not later than six months from the date of receipt of the copy of this order,” a Bench led by Justice AM Khanwilkar said.

Advertisement

It directed the investigating officer to ensure that witnesses were made available on the scheduled dates for being examined by the trial court.

The top court also granted bail to the accused trio — Manish Verma, Sanjeev Verma and Neetu Verma — on conditions to be imposed by the trial court and asked them to extend full cooperation for early completion of the trial.

“We are required to issue this direction as we have noticed that the trial court, despite having taken cognizance almost seven years back, has not moved in the matter even an inch thereafter, including to frame charges, as may be necessary, despite 78 adjournments in the case,” the Bench said, adding if they don’t cooperate the trial court can consider cancelling their bail.

Needless to observe that the order of cancellation of bail of the private respondents will not come in their way and the trial must proceed on its own merits and in accordance with law, it said in its September 15 order.

The order came on an appeal filed by Dr Atul Krishna challenging an Uttarakhand High Court order dismissing his plea seeking early disposal of the case. Krishna contended it was beyond imagination that despite the passing of more than six years from the date of filing of chargesheet and taking of cognizance, even the charges had not been framed till date.

The FIR in question was registered in 2012 by Krishna in Meerut against the respondents for cheating, criminal breach of trust, forgery of valuable security, will and forging records at Meerut with regard to a land deal. Later, the case was transferred to Dehradun as major properties mentioned in the FIR related to Dehradun district.

Advertisement
Show comments
Advertisement