TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
Sports
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | United StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | Time CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My MoneyAutoZone
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
Advertisement

Dabholkar murder case: Maharashtra court frames charges against five accused

Pune, September 15  A special court in Pune on Wednesday framed charges against five accused in the case of murder of anti-superstition activist Narendra Dabholkar. Dabholkar, who headed the Maharashtra Andhashraddha Nirmoolan Samiti, was shot dead in Pune on August...
Advertisement

Pune, September 15

Advertisement

 A special court in Pune on Wednesday framed charges against five accused in the case of murder of anti-superstition activist Narendra Dabholkar.

Advertisement

Dabholkar, who headed the Maharashtra Andhashraddha Nirmoolan Samiti, was shot dead in Pune on August 20, 2013, allegedly by members of a right-wing extremist group. The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) is conducting a probe into the case.

 A criminal trial starts once charges are framed.

On Wednesday, Additional Sessions Judge S R Navandar (special judge for UAPA cases) asked the five accused—Virendra Sinh Tawde, Sachin Andure, Sharad Kalaskar, Sanjeev Punalekar and Vikram Bhave— if they pleaded guilty, to which all of them replied in the negative. 

Advertisement

 Tawde, Kalaskar and Andure, who appeared via video-conferencing from their respective jails, sought more time from the court, citing that they want to discuss the matter with their lawyers.

 The court, however, rejected the plea.

 The other two accused- advocate Punalekar and Bhave—appeared in the court physically.

 The court framed charges against Tawde, Andure, Kalaskar, and Bhave under Indian Penal Code (IPC) Sections 302 (murder), 120 (B) (criminal conspiracy), 34 (common intention), relevant sections of the Arms Act, and Section 16 of the stringent Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) (punishment for terrorist act).

 Besides, the charges against Punalekar were framed under IPC Section 201 (causing disappearance of the evidence or giving false inform to screen offender).

Prakash Suryavanshi, CBI’s lawyer and special public prosecutor, later said the charges have been framed and further proceedings for the trial in the case have been scheduled on September 30. — PTI

 

Advertisement
Show comments
Advertisement