Add Tribune As Your Trusted Source
TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | ChinaUnited StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My Money
News Columns | Straight DriveCanada CallingLondon LetterKashmir AngleJammu JournalInside the CapitalHimachal CallingHill ViewBenchmark
Don't Miss
Advertisement

Govt should have been careful in issuing Justice Muralidhar’s transfer order: Justice Balakrishnan

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement

New Delhi, February 29

Advertisement

The government should have been a “little careful” while issuing the “midnight” order transferring Delhi High Court Judge S Muralidhar to the Punjab and Haryana High Court, former Chief Justice of India Justice KG Balakrishnan has said, amid a row over the timing of the transfer.

Advertisement

The transfer order was issued by the Union Law and Justice Ministry on February 26, the day a bench headed by Justice Muralidhar expressed “anguish” over Delhi Police’s failure to register FIRs against alleged hate speeches by three BJP leaders.

The government has said the transfer had nothing to do with any case as a recommendation to this effect was already made by the Supreme Court collegium and the judge had also given his consent.

Talking to PTI over phone on Friday, Justice Balakrishnan said it was a mere coincidence that the final transfer notification was issued on the day when he passed the order on the hate speeches because his shift had been already contemplated by the Supreme Court collegium a week ago.

Advertisement

“I don’t know on what date the transfer issue came up before the collegium,” he added.

Justice Muralidhar’s transfer had nothing to do with the observations he made while hearing the Delhi violence case, the former CJI said.

“When the situation in the country is so volatile and media and others are active the government should have been a little careful while issuing such midnight transfer order as there are chances of people thinking otherwise. The people could interpret differently,” Justice Balakrishnan said.

Moreover, the Delhi violence case was not taken up by Justice Muralidhar on his own. As the Delhi HC Chief Justice DN Patel was on leave that day and he being the third senior judge, Justice Muralidhar headed that particular bench which heard the case, he said.

Justice Balakrishnan said he did not think that Justice Muralidhar was asked to join on the next day itself in the Punjab and Haryana High Court.

Normally when such a transfer order is issued a joining time of not less than seven days is given to enable the transferred judge to prepare himself for the new posting, Justice Balakrishnan added.

An NGO — The campaign for Judicial Accountability and Reforms (CJAR) — on Thursday condemned the transfer of Justice Muralidhar, claiming the move was to punish an “honest and courageous”judicial officer.

The government’s notification stated that the President took the decision after consulting the Chief Justice of India. It, however, does not mention when Justice Muralidhar has to take charge of his office.

Union Law Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad said Justice Muralidhar was transferred following the recommendation of the SC collegium, asserting that a “well-settled process” was followed.

CJAR said it knows that Justice Muralidhar’s transfer was recommended by the SC collegium on February 12 but the rushed manner in which the notification had been issued by the government could not be ignored. PTI

Advertisement
Show comments
Advertisement