India accommodative and multipolar, says RSS leader
Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium
Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only BenefitsNagpur, February 15
RSS sah sarkaryawah (joint general secretary) Manmohan Vaidya on Saturday said India has always been an accommodative and a multipolar country. He was speaking at the ‘Second Nagpur Literary Festival’ here. “India always had a spiritual democracy. It has always been accommodative. Doing dharma has been Bharat’s swabhav (character/nature),” he said.
Shah confidant is MP BJP chief
Khajuraho MP Vishnu Dutt Sharma was on Saturday appointed the new president of the BJP in Madhya Pradesh, replacing incumbent Rakesh Singh, believed to be a trusted lieutenant of Union Home Minister Amit Shah. Sharma (49), a member of the RSS, had last month organised a grand pro-CAA rally in his constituency, which was attended by Amit Shah
“Dharma means to give to the society considering as its own. It means to share and give to the society. Dharma means enriching social capital,” he said. “Dharma does not necessarily mean religion, it means giving and sharing with the society. Similarly, rashtra means people. Rashtriyata does not mean nationalism. It is a western concept,” Vaidya said.
“Dharma does not discriminate. It connects the society and brings it together. Dharma unites and connects everyone,” he said.
“Why Bharat could not be converted to Islam or Christianity despite 800 years of Islamic and British rules? One of the reasons is that Bharat was always a multipolar country, where the society commanded and executed its own decisions, while the rulers played a supportive role,” Vaidya said.
“Dharma opens your eyes to get connected. You feel related, you are prompted to do something…that is dharma.
Our society has always been ‘dharmanishth’ (following principles of dharma). It was not state-based, but community-based. I feel the makers of the Constitution were very clear that secularism was not needed in India at that time,” he said.
“Bharatiya values were completely different,” he said. Vaidya called for the need to use Bharatiya words for English terms, which he said “tend to change the whole way of looking at concepts like religion, nationalism, secularism, tolerance and ideology.” — PTI