TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | ChinaUnited StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My MoneyAutoZone
News Columns | Straight DriveCanada CallingLondon LetterKashmir AngleJammu JournalInside the CapitalHimachal CallingHill View
Don't Miss
Advertisement

Judicial officers can't be district judges via direct recruitment: SC

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement

Satya Prakash

Advertisement

Tribune News Service

Advertisement

New Delhi, February 19

Members of subordinate judiciary services are not eligible to be appointed as district judges by way of direct recruitment, the Supreme Court ruled on Wednesday.

“We find that rules debarring judicial officers from staking their claim as against posts reserved for direct recruitment from Bar are not ultra vires as rules are subservient to the provisions of the Constitution,” a three-judge Bench headed by Justice Arun Mishra said.

Advertisement

The Bench – which also included Justice Vineet Sharan and Justice S Ravindra Bhat – said the members in the judicial service of a state can be appointed as district judges only by way of promotion or limited competitive examination.

“Under Article 232(2), an advocate or a pleader with 7 years of practice can be appointed as district judge by way of direct recruitment in case he is not already in the judicial service of the Union or a State,” said the Bench.

The top court upheld the rules framed by the Delhi High Court prohibiting judicial service officers from staking claim to the post of district judge against the posts reserved for advocates by way of direct recruitment, saying these were in conformity with Articles 14, 16 and 233 of the Constitution.

Advertisement
Show comments
Advertisement