TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | ChinaUnited StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My MoneyAutoZone
News Columns | Straight DriveCanada CallingLondon LetterKashmir AngleJammu JournalInside the CapitalHimachal CallingHill View
Don't Miss
Advertisement

Kangana committed ‘grave violation of plan’ while merging her flats: Court

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement

Mumbai, January 1

Advertisement

Actor Kangana Ranaut violated the sanctioned plan while merging her three flats, a civil court here has remarked while rejecting her plea seeking to restrain the Mumbai civic body from demolishing the unauthorised construction.

Advertisement

A court in suburban Dindoshi dismissed an application filed by Kangana last week. The detailed order became available on Thursday.

Judge LS Chavan noted in the order that Kangana, who owns three flats on the fifth floor of a 16-storey building in the Khar area of the city, merged them into one.

In doing so, she covered the sunk area, duct area, common passage and converted free Floor Space Index (FSI) into habitable area, the judge observed.

Advertisement

“These are grave violation of the sanctioned plan for which the permission of the competent authority is required,” the court said.

The Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) had in March 2018 issued a notice to the actor for “unauthorised constructions” at her Khar flats.

Another notice asked her to restore the structure to its original position as per the original plan, warning that otherwise the unauthorised portion would be demolished.

Kangana challenged the demolition notice and also requested the court to restrain the civic body from carrying out demolition. The court had then ordered status-quo.

In the latest order on December 23, Judge Chavan rejected the actor’s application, saying the “interference of this court is not required”.

However, the court has given her six weeks to approach the Bombay High Court against the order.

On September 9, the BMC had demolished parts of Kangana’s bungalow in the Pali Hill area for alleged “unauthorised” construction. She moved the High Court against it.

The High Court later termed the BMC’s action as illegal and malicious. PTI

Advertisement
Show comments
Advertisement