TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
Sports
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | United StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My MoneyAutoZone
News Columns | Kashmir AngleJammu JournalInside the CapitalHimachal CallingHill View
Don't Miss
Advertisement

Let religious people deal with it: Supreme Court on Ahobilam Mutt Temple row

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement
Advertisement

New Delhi, January 27

Advertisement

The Supreme Court on Friday refused to entertain the Andhra Pradesh Government’s petition challenging a state High Court’s order holding that the state administration had no authority under law to appoint an executive officer to the Ahobilam mutt temple.

“Let the religious people deal with it,” a Bench led by Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul said. The government has no authority, jurisdiction or entitlement under law to appoint an executive officer of the Sri Ahobila Mutt Parampara Aadheena Sri Lakshmi Narasimha Swamy Devasthanam’ (Ahobilam Mutt Temple), it added.

“In every case under Article 136 (special leave to appeal by the Supreme Court), we need not try to settle the law,” the Bench told the state’s counsel.

Advertisement

The state and others had challenged the October 13, 2022 HC order, which said the Ahobilam temple was an “integral and inseparable part of the Ahobilam Math, which was established as a part of propagation of Hindu religion and for rendering spiritual service for propagating Sri Vaishnavism”.

Advertisement
Show comments
Advertisement