TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
Sports
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | United StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My MoneyAutoZone
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
Don't Miss
Advertisement

No place for emotions in contempt cases: Supreme Court

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement
Advertisement

New Delhi, July 30

Advertisement

Maintaining that the contempt jurisdiction enjoyed by courts is only for upholding the majesty of the judicial system, the Supreme Court has said the courts must act judiciously while exercising this power.

Sets aside Calcutta High Court order

  • The apex court set aside a Calcutta High Court order revoking a doctor’s licence
  • It said the licence could not be suspended as penalty in contempt proceedings over failure to remove an unauthorised construction

“The court has time and again asserted that the contempt jurisdiction is only for the purpose of upholding the majesty of the judicial system that exists. While exercising this power, the courts must not be hypersensitive or swung by emotions, but must act judiciously,” a Bench of Justice R Gavai and Justice Sanjay Karol said.

Advertisement

Setting aside a Calcutta High Court order revoking a doctor’s licence, the top court said the licence could not be suspended as penalty in contempt proceedings.

Advertisement
Tags :
SupremeCourt
Show comments
Advertisement