TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | ChinaUnited StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My MoneyAutoZone
News Columns | Straight DriveCanada CallingLondon LetterKashmir AngleJammu JournalInside the CapitalHimachal CallingHill View
Don't Miss
Advertisement

Riots: Supreme Court frowns upon lengthy bail hearings

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement

Tribune News Service
New Delhi, July 22

Advertisement

The Supreme Court on Thursday frowned upon lengthy hearings on bail applications, saying it was troubled at the fact that bail matters were being heard at length.

Advertisement

While hearing a petition filed by the Delhi Police against the June 15 Delhi High Court verdict granting bail to three student leaders booked under stringent anti-terror law — Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) in connection with Delhi riots, a Bench led by Justice SK Kaul made it clear that it won’t devote more than two hours to the matter.

Maharashtra BJP MLAs move SC against suspension

Suspended for a year from the Maharashtra Legislative Assembly for allegedly misbehaving with the presiding officer, 12 BJP MLAs from the state on Thursday moved the Supreme Court challenging the July 5 decision of presiding officer. TNS

Advertisement

“This is something which is troubling us many times. Every bail matter is argued at length before the trial courts, high courts and this court…The provisions of the Act are not to be debated in a bail matter,” it told Solicitor General Tushar Mehta.

It posted the matter for hearing after four weeks after senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for the students, said, “We don’t have wherewithal to print 20,000 pages. Please allow us to file it in pen drive.”

The Bench sought if the police were aggrieved by grant of bail or interpretation of UAPA provisions and observations in the verdicts.

Advertisement
Show comments
Advertisement