TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
Sports
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | United StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My MoneyAutoZone
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
Don't Miss
Advertisement

SC allows scribe for candidates suffering from writer’s cramp

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement

Tribune News Service

Advertisement

New Delhi, February 11

Advertisement

Holding that writer’s cramp can be considered as a disability, the Supreme Court on Thursday ruled that those suffering from it were entitled to take scribe to write competitive examinations, including Civil Services Examinations.

Writer’s cramp is a type of focal dystonia—a neurologic movement disorder—that affects one’s fingers, hand, or forearm. The patient’s brain sends incorrect information to the muscles, causing involuntary, excessive muscle contractions making his/her hands twist into odd postures.

A Bench led by Justice DY Chandrachud asked the Centre to frame guidelines in three months to protect the rights of disabled students and enable them to write all competitive examinations with help of a scribe in tune with the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act 2016.

Advertisement

The ruling came on a petition filed by Vikas Kumar, an MBBS graduate, who suffered from Writer’s Cramp and was denied a scribe by the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) as the rules allowed only candidates with locomotor disability and cerebral palsy to have a scribe.

“To confine the facility of a scribe only to those who have benchmark disabilities would be to deprive a class of persons of their statutorily recognised entitlements. To do so would be contrary to the plain terms as well as the object of the Act,” the top court said.

The Bench said it was neither a largesse nor a privilege and the provision for a scribe was in tune with the mandate of the Disability Act to ensure that persons with disabilities were able to live a life of equality and dignity based on respect in society.

The Centre had contended that it could be potentially misused.

However, the top court said, “When competent persons with disabilities are unable to realise their full potential due to the barriers posed in their path, our society suffers, as much, if not more, as do the disabled people involved. In their blooming and blossoming, we all bloom and blossom.”

Advertisement
Show comments
Advertisement