TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
Sports
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | United StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My MoneyAutoZone
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
Don't Miss
Advertisement

Supreme Court says no to petition for postponement of GATE

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement
Advertisement

New Delhi, February 3

Advertisement

The Supreme Court on Thursday refused to entertain a petition seeking postponement of the Graduate Aptitude Test in Engineering Exam (GATE) commencing from February 5.

Too late to interfere

Interfering in the examination process just 48 hours before it is due to start could create chaos. SC Bench

Advertisement

A Bench led by Justice DY Chandrachud said interfering in the examination process just 48 hours before it was due to commence could create chaos and uncertainty.

The top court said it was a policy matter on which the government authorities concerned should take decisions.

GATE 2022 Examinations are scheduled to take place in offline mode on February 5, 6, 12 and 13.

Stating that nine lakh students were appearing for GATE at hundreds of centres, the petitioners accused the authorities of not issuing Covid-appropriate guidelines for conducting the test.

Terming it an academic policy matter, it said, “We cannot start postponing exams like this. Everything is opening up now. We cannot play with the careers of students like this.”

“The plea for postponement of the GATE just 48 hours before the scheduled date on February 5 is replete with potential for chaos and uncertainty in the lives of students. There is no overarching reason why this court should under Article 32 (of the Constitution) supplant the role of the authorities,” the top court said.

Advertisement
Show comments
Advertisement