TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
Sports
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | United StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My MoneyAutoZone
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
Don't Miss
Advertisement

SC stays criminal proceedings against former Wipro chairman Azim Premji and others

Case pertains to allegations of breach of trust and corruption in merger of three firms with a group firm

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement

Tribune News Service
New Delhi, December 18

Advertisement

The Supreme Court on Friday stayed criminal proceedings against WIPRO founder Azim Premji and his wife in a Karnataka court over merger of companies.

Advertisement

A Bench headed by Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul also issued notice on Premji’s petition challenging the summons issued to him by a local court on a private complaint alleging illegal transfer of assets worth crores of rupees from three companies into a private trust and newly formed company.

Earlier, the Karnataka High Court had dismissed petitions led by Premji, his wife and two others challenging the summonses issued in January this year.

The trial court had issued summonses against them on a private complaint led by Chennai-based company India Awake for Transparency.

Advertisement

On behalf of Premji, senior counsel AM Singhvi told the top court that it was a bizarre case. He said three companies of the Azim Premji group, entirely owned by him and his mother, merged into a fourth company of the same group known as ‘Hasham’ and it was being questioned. He asserted that there was no illegality in it.

Advertisement
Show comments
Advertisement