Add Tribune As Your Trusted Source
TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | ChinaUnited StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My MoneyAutoZone
News Columns | Straight DriveCanada CallingLondon LetterKashmir AngleJammu JournalInside the CapitalHimachal CallingHill ViewBenchmark
Don't Miss
Advertisement

Uddhav camp wants Sena row to be decided by 7-judge Bench

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement

New Delhi, December 13

Advertisement

The Uddhav Thackeray faction of the Shiv Sena on Tuesday told the Supreme Court that the issues arising out of the recent political crisis in Maharashtra should be decided by a seven-judge Constitution Bench.

Advertisement

As the matter came up for hearing before a five-judge Constitution Bench led by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, senior counsel Kapil Sibal said the top court’s five-judge Bench verdict in the Nabam Rebia case (2016) on powers of Assembly Speaker to deal with disqualification of MLAs under the anti-defection law needed a relook by a seven-judge Bench.

Advertisement
Show comments
Advertisement