TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
Sports
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | United StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My MoneyAutoZone
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
Don't Miss
Advertisement

Act as marriage counsellors, HC advises family courts

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement

Saurabh Malik
Tribune News Service
Chandigarh, March 13

Advertisement

Examine the conduct of estranged couples as psychologists, while acting like marriage counsellors. But take a decision only when nothing works, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has advised family courts dealing with matrimonial disputes.

Advertisement

“In matrimonial matters, the family court not only has to deal with the facts and law, but also with the conduct of both parties, studying them as a psychologist and acting as a marriage counsellor. If nothing works, then, (act) as a judge bound to make a final decision,” Justice Rajiv Narain Raina asserted while adding that the court could only wish “reparation of the hearts and a reconciliation of conflict”.

Justice Raina added the matrimonial disputes, after all, were matters of the heart and no human being could be compelled to live with another, if their hearts and minds were asunder. “The family court and neither this court is a mender of broken hearts.”

The assertions came in a case where the wife lodged an FIR in December, 2010, alleging cruelty, cheating, outraging modesty and other offences against her husband and other persons.

Advertisement

The husband was arrested, detained and remanded in judicial custody before being released on bail. Justice Raina observed the husband filed two divorce petitions. Apparently, the first one was filed when he was facing criminal trial in which he was acquitted after the court found him innocent. His second plea came only after the acquittal.

Advertisement
Show comments
Advertisement