TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
Sports
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | United StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My MoneyAutoZone
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
Don't Miss
Advertisement

Badals get relief from Supreme Court on dual constitution row

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement

New Delhi, November 1

Advertisement

The Supreme Court on Tuesday stayed the proceedings before a Hoshiarpur court in the alleged case of forgery and cheating filed against Sukhbir Singh Badal, Parkash Singh Badal and Daljit Singh Cheema in the controversy over dual constitution of SAD.

Advertisement

A Bench comprising Justices S Abdul Nazeer and V Ramasubramanian issued a notice and stayed the proceedings in the criminal complaint before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hoshiarpur.

Hoshiarpur resident Balwant Singh Khera had filed a criminal complaint before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate in 2009 accusing SAD of submitting two different constitutions — one with the Gurdwara Election Commission (GEC) and the second with the Election Commission of India (ECI) to seek recognition as a political party.

The petitioners — Sukhbir Singh Badal, Prakash Singh Badal and Cheema — moved the apex court challenging the Punjab and Haryana High Court order, which rejected their plea seeking quashing of the complaint.

Advertisement

Senior advocate RS Cheema appeared for Sukhbir and senior advocate KV Viswanathan appeared for Parkash Singh Badal assisted by advocates from Karanjawala & Co. Advocate Sandeep Kapur appeared for Cheema. The petitions were filed by Karanjawala & Co.

It was argued before the court that being religious does not run contrary to the principles of secularism and merely because a political outfit is contesting elections to a gurdwara committee does not mean it is not secular. The criminal case with allegations of forgery and cheating over the constitution of the party filed before the ECI and GEC therefore had no basis, it was argued.

The complaint was based on the allegation that the party had given a declaration to abide by the principles of secularism in its constitution filed before the EC, while it contests SGPC polls thereby being a religious party. — IANS

Advertisement
Show comments
Advertisement