TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | ChinaUnited StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My MoneyAutoZone
News Columns | Straight DriveCanada CallingLondon LetterKashmir AngleJammu JournalInside the CapitalHimachal CallingHill View
Don't Miss
Advertisement

Faridkot: Bank, revenue officials depose in ex-MLA Kushaldeep Singh Dhillon case

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement

Faridkot, December 12

Advertisement

To prove its disproportionate assets case against former Congress MLA Kushaldeep Singh Dhillon, the Vigilance Bureau (VB) produced bank and revenue officials (patwaris) as witnesses in the court of Additional District and Sessions Judge, Faridkot. The witnesses provided details of the bank transactions and land records in the name of family members of the former MLA.

Advertisement

The counsel for Dhillon also moved an application in the court, seeking a direction to the VB to supply him copies of records seized during investigation but not made part of the challan. The former Faridkot MLA has been booked and challaned by the VB for disproportionate assets and purchasing ‘benami’ properties in the names of co-accused Gursewak Singh and Rajwinder Singh.

During the hearing, the VB claimed that it had sufficient material to make a prima-facie case against all accused. However, the counsel for accused Gursewak claimed he had the capacity to purchase the properties in his own name and there was “no iota of evidence to prove his complicity in the allegations levelled against Dhillon”.

While perusing the police report with appended documents, the court said a prima-facie case existed against all accused under Section 120-B of IPC for hatching a criminal conspiracy under which benami properties and benami transactions were done by the disproportionate income derived by accused Dhillon.

Advertisement

Advertisement
Tags :
CongressFaridkot
Show comments
Advertisement