Add Tribune As Your Trusted Source
TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | ChinaUnited StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My Money
News Columns | Straight DriveCanada CallingLondon LetterKashmir AngleJammu JournalInside the CapitalHimachal CallingHill ViewBenchmark
Don't Miss
Advertisement

HC denies anticipatory bail to journalist

Allegedly circulated inflammatory content targeting a community
The Punjab and Haryana High Court today upheld a clause in the prospectus issued by the Chandigarh Administration for admission to MBBS course, wherein the definition and scope of the Foreign Indian Students (FIS) was restricted to exclude the relations of Non-Resident Indians (NRI). - File photo

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has refused anticipatory bail to a journalist accused of circulating abusive and inflammatory digital content targeting the Purvanchal community.

Advertisement

Justice Sumeet Goel held the matter was not only serious, but possessed the potential to disturb public order and peace among the communities.

Advertisement

“At this stage, such material cannot be brushed aside as wholly unreliable and the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner would hamper the ongoing investigation and undermine the effort to maintain communal harmony,” Justice Goel asserted.

Sandeep Singh Attal had moved the court against the state seeking grant of anticipatory bail in a case registered on October 21 at Division No.7 police station in Ludhiana district.

Referring to electronic evidence gathered so far, including the supplementary statement and a pen-drive produced by the complainant, the court asserted: “It indicates that the petitioner, being a journalist, circulated abusive and inflammatory remarks against the Purvanchal community, migrant labourers and women of that community”. The allegations were also supported by a memorandum signed by several members of the community.

Advertisement

The court observed that the digital material produced during investigation prima facie indicated that the petitioner was instrumental in circulating content containing derogatory and inflammatory statements targeting specific groups.

Advertisement
Show comments
Advertisement