Add Tribune As Your Trusted Source
TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | ChinaUnited StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My MoneyAutoZone
News Columns | Straight DriveCanada CallingLondon LetterKashmir AngleJammu JournalInside the CapitalHimachal CallingHill ViewBenchmark
Don't Miss
Advertisement

HC notice to Centre, Bathinda varsity on registrar's appointment

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has issued notice to the Government of India and the Central University of Punjab, Bathinda, on a petition challenging the appointment of Vijay Sharma on the post of registrar.

Advertisement

The respondents have been directed by the high court to file a reply within six weeks. University's Controller of Examination Balwinder Pal Garg, in his petition, has alleged Vijay Sharma does not have the required qualification of 15 years of administrative experience, including eight years as deputy registrar or an equivalent post. He added that Sharma was not entitled either to be appointed or continue as the registrar.

Advertisement

Garg said he had on an earlier occasion approached the high court challenging the appointment of Sharma. The high court, in its order dated May 29, 2025, directed the respondents to consider his legal notice dated April 25 and pass a speaking order within a period of two months.

He said though the university passed a speaking order dated September 17, 2025, it was more of an exercise to hide the ineligibility of Sharma for the said post.

After hearing the arguments, Justice Sandeep Moudgil issued the notice to the respondents and directed them to file their reply within six weeks. The case was adjourned to December 18.

Advertisement

Advertisement
Show comments
Advertisement