Add Tribune As Your Trusted Source
TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | ChinaUnited StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My Money
News Columns | Straight DriveCanada CallingLondon LetterKashmir AngleJammu JournalInside the CapitalHimachal CallingHill ViewBenchmark
Don't Miss
Advertisement

High Court wants affidavit on disposal of seized contraband

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement

Saurabh Malik

Advertisement

Tribune News Service

Advertisement

Chandigarh, April 17

The Punjab and Haryana High Court wants to know whether seized contraband was being disposed of in a timely manner. It has called for an affidavit on the issue by the incharge of the special task force.

“The Director-General of Police/Additional Director General of Police, special task force, shall file an affidavit, stating as to whether contraband, specifically poppy husk, is being disposed of in a timely manner in terms of the directions issued earlier by the Supreme Court…,” Justice Amol Rattan Singh ordered. The direction came on a petition filed by a drugs case accused through counsel Ishan Gupta. Justice Amol Rattan Singh also called for details of poppy husk still lying with the state, “as has not been disposed of, which should have been disposed of in terms thereof”.

Advertisement

In its judgment on the storage of seized narcotics, the apex court had ordered destruction to prevent recirculation. The court had, in fact, issued guidelines on the disposal of narcotic drugs, psychotropic and controlled substances. The apex court Bench, comprising then Chief Justice TS Thakur and Justice Kurian Joseph, had issued the directions to “avoid any confusion arising out of the continued presence of two notifications on the same subject”.

The apex court had also requested the Chief Justices of the high courts across the country to appoint a committee of judges on the administrative side to supervise and monitor progress made by the respective states in regard to compliance of the directions.

The HC had, subsequently, constituted a committee to oversee action taken on prompt disposal of contraband recovered by the police in view of the apex court guidelines.

The counsels for the states of Punjab and Haryana, along with the Union Territory of Chandigarh, also undertook to comply with the Supreme Court directions “in letter and spirit”.

Advertisement
Show comments
Advertisement