TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
Sports
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | United StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My MoneyAutoZone
News Columns | Kashmir AngleJammu JournalInside the CapitalHimachal CallingHill View
Don't Miss
Advertisement

Punjab: Irrigation Dept asked to give land for afforestation

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement

Rajmeet Singh

Advertisement

Advertisement

Chandigarh, July 25

Around eight years after 24,777 trees were illegally felled for widening the 800-km-long Bist-Doab canal, the Forest Department has asked the Irrigation Department to provide 60 hectares of land to carry out compensatory afforestation. The trees were cut in 2016 during the SAD-BJP regime.

The Rs 270-crore project to widen the canal had sparked a row after foresters and environmentalists cried foul over tree felling in an area classified as “protected forest”. The canal and its distributaries that meander through Nawanshahr and Jalandhar districts carry the Sutlej water from the Ropar headworks.

Advertisement

Taking up the matter, the National Green Tribunal (NGT) had termed the cutting of trees as illegal as permission under the Forest Conservation Act (FCA), 1980, had not been sought. The NGT had asked the state to carry out compensatory afforestation on an equivalent area of non-forest land, besides paying for its maintenance for five years.

Sources said the Irrigation Department had been asked to provide nearly Rs 2 crore for carrying out plantation under the Compensatory Afforestation Fund Management and Planning Authority (CAMPA).

Earlier, the Forest Department was questioned over spending lakhs of rupees from the CAMPA funds to defend a deforestation case before the NGT. The department spent around Rs 86 lakh on the fee of senior advocates.

Advertisement
Show comments
Advertisement