TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
Sports
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | United StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My MoneyAutoZone
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
Don't Miss
Advertisement

No representative from Punjab on MSP panel

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement

Karam Prakash

Advertisement

Advertisement

New Delhi, December 17

Though the Centre had formed a committee on Minimum Support Price (MSP) in July this year, Union Minister of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare Narendra Singh Tomar said there was no member from Punjab in the committee.

He said this in reply to a question by Punjab Rajya Sabha MP Vikramjit Sawhney, who has already lodged his protest in the ongoing Parliament session over the exclusion.

Advertisement

As per the Agriculture Minister, the committee consists of representatives from both the central government and state governments and farmers, agri-scientists and agri-economists to make the MSP more effective and transparent.

Lamenting the government, the MP asked why no representative, either an expert from Punjab Agriculture University or the Agriculture Commissioner or a government official, from the state had been included in the committee.

The committee was formed on the directions of Prime Minister Narendra Modi while withdrawing the three contentious farm laws and it still has three vacant posts for members of the Samyukt Kisan Morcha (SKM). The reason: the union has rejected proposal of the committee formed by the government.

Reiterating their stand, Jagmohan Singh, a member of the SKM, said, “We have already rejected the committee. The chairman of the committee should be an agriculturist or an economist, but that is not the case. The so-called farmer leaders, who had nothing to do with farmer agitation, are members of the committee. We totally reject this committee and won’t be part of it.”

Non-official members’ post in CACP vacant

Advertisement
Show comments
Advertisement