TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
Sports
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | United StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My MoneyAutoZone
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
Don't Miss
Advertisement

HC raps Punjab for procedural lapses in cases against agents

The Punjab and Haryana High Court. file photo

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has rapped the Punjab for procedural lapses in investigating cases involving unscrupulous travel agents. “The consolidation of unrelated cases into joint final reports not only reflects a serious lapse in due process of law, but also has the potential to prejudice the rights of both the accused and the victims,” Justice Harpreet Singh Brar asserted.

Advertisement

The case before the court pertained to improper consolidation of multiple independent complaints. The state counsel told the court that four separate final reports under Section 173 of the CrPC had been presented against 26 accused.

Advertisement

The petitioners’ stand is that the allegations in these cases are distinct and independent, involving different accused and victims.

Justice Brar asserted that the fundamental issue before the court remained unaddressed. Referring to an affidavit filed in the matter by Jalandhar Commissioner of Police Dhanpreet Kaur, the court asserted it failed to satisfactorily address the query regarding the improper clubbing of cases involving distinct occurrences, separate victims, and different accused into consolidated final reports under Section 173 of the CrPC.

“Each of these final reports continues to club together multiple accused persons who have no connection with each other. The filing of four separate final reports does not cure the underlying procedural infirmity,” Justice Brar said.

Advertisement

Advertisement
Show comments
Advertisement