We are doing this to our enemy country, let us not do this within our states: HC

"We are doing this to our enemy country. Let us not do this within our states," the Punjab and Haryana High Court asserted this afternoon before Punjab undertook before the Bench that its police would not interfere in the functioning of the Bhakra Beas Management Board (BBMB).

The matter has been disposed of, but judgment was not yet available.

The Bench of Chief Justice Sheel Nagu and Justice Sumeet Goel was hearing a plea filed by the BBMB against the deployment of the additional police personnel at the Nangal dam and the alleged impediment in the flow of 8,500 cusecs of water to Haryana. Among other things, the Bench observed that logically and ideally, Central paramilitary police forces were required be deployed at institutes of national importance.

At the onset, BBMB counsel and senior advocate Rajesh Garg submitted: “The reservoir is going to overflow and the downstream states are going to go dry.” He contended that the sudden increase in the deployment of Punjab Police personnel at the dam — from 15 to 55 — indicated an attempt to block the flow of water.

Responding to the submissions, senior advocate and former Advocate-General Gurminder Singh insisted that law and order fell within the exclusive domain of the State. “Law and order is the State subject. The BBMB cannot say what the police should do or police would be deployed. They want illegal resolutions implemented,” he argued, urging the court to consider “such a delicate time when border tensions are there”.

Additional Solicitor-General of India Satya Pal Jain, on the other hand Jain, submitted: “The water is not out of share of Punjab. For me, all States are equal. Water comes from Himachal Pradesh. What happens tomorrow if they stop? This is not in good spirit.” He submitted that the BBMB resolution permitting the release was not challenged, and any grievance ought to be taken up legally, not through unilateral administrative actions.

The Bench was told that the BBMB, a statutory expert body, had resolved to release 8,500 cusecs after a demand raised by Haryana. Advocate-General Parminder Singh Chauhan submitted on the State of Haryana’s behalf that Punjab was opposing water distribution “tooth and nail,” and said that “under the garb of protecting the dam, what are they doing? This is not their job.” He clarified that the sanctioned release included 1,049 cusecs for Delhi and 850 for Rajasthan, apart from Haryana’s share.

Chauhan added that the objections, if any, should be addressed through proper channels before the Central Government and not through actions such as deployment of the state police. “Punjab has objected but decision has been made. Punjab can approach Central Government,” he said.

The court reserved its order to be delivered later in the evening after hearing the arguments at length.