TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | ChinaUnited StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My MoneyAutoZone
News Columns | Straight DriveCanada CallingLondon LetterKashmir AngleJammu JournalInside the CapitalHimachal CallingHill View
Don't Miss
Advertisement

Lanka SC issues notice to govt over India-backed ID project

Prime Minister Narendra Modi with Sri Lankan President Anura Kumara Dissanayake. File

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement

Sri Lanka’s Supreme Court on Wednesday issued notices to President Anura Kumara Dissanayake and the Cabinet over the India-funded Sri Lanka Unique Digital Identity (SL-UDI) programme following a petition alleging violation of fundamental rights.

Advertisement

The petition was filed by former minister Wimal Weerawansa, who contended that the government’s decision to proceed with the project violates fundamental rights and lacked transparency as neither Parliament nor the public had been adequately informed.

Advertisement

During PM Narendra Modi’s visit to Colombo in April, the two sides signed an MoU on sharing India’s large-scale digital solutions to support Sri Lanka’s digital transformation drive.

The Unique Digital Identity project, backed by an Indian grant, aims to provide Sri Lankan citizens with a secure digital ID similar to India’s Aadhaar system. The petitioner claimed the project posed a threat to Sri Lanka’s national security as citizens’ biometric data could be exposed to foreign entities without adequate safeguards.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Show comments
Advertisement