HC seeks Delhi Police’s reply on Namdhari’s bail
New Delhi, March 7
The Delhi High Court has sought the Delhi Police’s reply on the bail plea of sacked Uttarakhand minorities panel chief Sukhdev Singh Namdhari, who, along with 20 others, is facing a murder trial in a 2012 shootout here that claimed the lives of liquor baron Ponty Chadha and his younger brother Hardeep.
Justice PS Teji also asked the police to file their status report on Namdhari’s plea which said he was “no more required by investigating agency and no purpose will be served while keeping him in jail with hardened criminals”.
The trial court in July last year had framed charges under Section 302 (murder) read with Section 149 (offence committed by member of unlawful assembly) of the IPC against all 21 accused, including Namdhari and his Personal Security Officer (PSO) Sachin Tyagi.
Namdhari, however, in his bail plea, claimed that he was innocent and the complainant of the case on whose statement an FIR was lodged had not supported the police theory that he was part of the conspiracy in which the two brothers died. He said the FIR did not contain his name and neither did the complainant mention his role in the incident.
The application also said he had never misused any condition imposed on him during an interim bail granted on earlier occasions. Currently, he is on interim bail which is to end on March 18.
“The rule is to allow bail rather to refuse the same. The bail ought not to be held as punishment, since the law presumes an accused to be innocent till the guilt is proved,” Namdhari said in his plea filed through advocate RS Malik.
Ponty and Hardeep, who were allegedly involved in a property dispute, were killed in a shootout at a Chhattarpur farmhouse here on November 17, 2012. Subsequently, Namdhari was arrested on November 23, 2012. Later, the remaining accused were apprehended.
Namdhari, in his bail application, also claimed that there was no “premeditation” for shooting at Hardeep. “The provocation came from the side of Hardeep, as he started firing indiscriminately at Ponty and his PSO fired the alleged shot in self defence... There was no reason or occasion for him to be part of the conspiracy as he and his PSO had no interest in the properties of the deceased brother. They were not to be benefited in any manner and had thus no reason to be part of such conspiracy,” the accused’s counsel contended.
On January 28, 2014, the trial court had dropped murder charges against all accused and added the charge of culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 of the IPC against the alleged main conspirator Namdhari and his Personal Security Officer Sachin Tyagi.
On May 15 last year, on the plea of the police, the Delhi High Court had overturned the trial court’s decision and directed framing of murder charges against all 21 accused.
Ponty and Hardeep were also chargesheeted in the case. However, the trial against them had abated as they were killed in the shootout.
The court had ordered framing of criminal conspiracy, common intention and those under the Arms Act against all 21 accused for trying to take over the disputed farmhouse from the possession of Hardeep.
The Delhi Police had filed two chargesheets in the case and levelled murder charges against all accused. The first chargesheet had named Ponty as an accused as he had reached the place of the incident with Namdhari and others as part of his “well-hatched conspiracy” to take possession of the South Delhi farm house.
The supplementary chargesheet had accused Hardeep in the case, saying the probe had shown Ponty was killed by the shot fired at him by his brother. — PTI
