DT
PT
Subscribe To Print Edition About The Tribune Code Of Ethics Download App Advertise with us Classifieds
search-icon-img
search-icon-img
Advertisement

Ayodhya land dispute: No hearing in SC as Constitution bench judge unavailable

  • fb
  • twitter
  • whatsapp
  • whatsapp
featured-img featured-img
The Constitution bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi was scheduled to hear arguments of senior lawyer CS Vaidyanathan, representing deity ‘Ram Lalla Virajman’ for the eighth day.
Advertisement

New Delhi, August 19

Advertisement

The hearing in the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid land dispute case could not take place in the Supreme Court on Monday due to unavailability of one of the five judges of the Constitution bench.

The Constitution bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi was scheduled to hear arguments of senior lawyer CS Vaidyanathan, representing deity ‘Ram Lalla Virajman’ for the eighth day.

Advertisement

Minutes before the commencement of the hearing, lawyers on both sides were told by the court staff that Justice SA Bobde was unavailable.

Besides CJI and Justice Bobde, Justices DY Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan and SA Nazeer are part of the bench which is hearing the appeal in the case.

Advertisement

On Friday, Vaidyanathan had told the court that a “massive” temple of Lord Ram, dating back to the second century BC, existed at the disputed site in Ayodhya before the construction of the Babri Masjid.

Fourteen appeals have been filed in the apex court against the 2010 Allahabad High Court judgment, delivered in four civil suits, that the 2.77-acre disputed land in Ayodhya be partitioned equally among the three parties--the Sunni Waqf Board, the Nirmohi Akhara and ‘Ram Lalla Virajman’.

The Babri Masjid in Ayodhya was demolished by right-wing activists on December 6, 1992, leading to the protracted legal battle. PTI

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
tlbr_img1 Classifieds tlbr_img2 Videos tlbr_img3 Premium tlbr_img4 E-Paper tlbr_img5 Shorts